PINCUS HUETER v. KRUSE et al
| 1:2020cv03686 |
| February 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
329
MEMORANDUM OPINION re motions to dismiss and other pending motions. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 6/18/22. (lctnm2)
|
|
Filing
322
MEMORANDUM OPINION re Defendant Secretary Haaland's 247 Motion to Dismiss, American Samoa Defendants' 113 Motion for Sanctions, and Plaintiff's 125 Motion for Sanctions and 126 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 3/18/22. (lctnm2)
|
|
Filing
123
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying Plaintiff's 95 Motion for Leave to File Fourth Amended Complaint. Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff's 104 Third Amended Complaint on or before August 10, 2021. See attached Memorandum Order for further details. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 7/20/2021. (lctnm2)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM OPINION re Plaintiff's 14 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction and Plaintiff's 60 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 2/26/2021. (lctnm2)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PINCUS HUETER v. KRUSE et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
