SINGH et al v. WOLF et al
APARNA SINGH and SHARAD SINGH |
CHAD WOLF, DONNA COMPAGNOLO, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI and WILLIAM P. BARR |
1:2020cv03754 |
December 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Randolph D Moss |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by APARNA SINGH, SHARAD SINGH (Green, Brian) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 12/23/2020. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 2/21/2021. (Green, Brian) |
![]() |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to DONNA COMPAGNOLO, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, CHAD WOLF, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zmd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and for Writ of Mandamus against WILLIAM P. BARR, DONNA COMPAGNOLO, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, CHAD WOLF ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-7979664) filed by APARNA SINGH, SHARAD SINGH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-J, #3 Summons Civil Process Clerk, #4 Summons Chad Wolf, #5 Summons William P. Barr, #6 Summons Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, #7 Summons Donna Compagnolo)(Green, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.