LATIF et al v. CUCCINELLI
| CHRISTOPHER RICHARDS and TAHSINA LATIF |
| KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, III |
| 1:2020cv03818 |
| December 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Emmet G Sullivan |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by TAHSINA LATIF, CHRISTOPHER RICHARDS (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Boyd Palmer-Ball on behalf of KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, III (Palmer-Ball, Katherine) (Main Document 4 replaced on 1/14/2021) (zjf). |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER: The parties are directed to read the attached Standing Order Governing Civil Cases Before Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in its entirety upon receipt. The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives in the attached Standing Order. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 1/8/21. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1) (mac)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, III, and U.S. Attorney (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. (adh, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8005018) filed by TAHSINA LATIF, CHRISTOPHER RICHARDS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
