HALL v. WOLF et al
| STEVEN H. HALL |
| DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and CHAD F. WOLF |
| 1:2020cv03860 |
| December 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| James E Boasberg |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER: As Plaintiff's Complaint falls within the scope of this Court's pre-filing injunction in No. 18-461 and he has not sought leave to file, the Court ORDERS that: 1) Plaintiff's #2 IFP Motion is DENIED; and 2) The case is DISMISSED. Had he sought leave, leave would have been denied given that he again seeks to litigate his termination from DHS. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 1/22/2021. (lcjeb2)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by STEVEN H. HALL, #1 Complaint filed by STEVEN H. HALL. (See order for details). Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 01/20/2021. (zsb)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg pursuant to #3 Order. (zsb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by STEVEN H. HALL (zsb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF with Jury Demand filed by STEVEN H. HALL. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(zsb) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 12/31/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
