THE REPUBLIC OF THE GAMBIA v. TWITTER, INC.
| THE REPUBLIC OF THE GAMBIA and REPUBLIC OF THE GAMBIA |
| TWITTER, INC. |
| 1:2020mc00028 |
| May 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| John D Bates |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION by REPUBLIC OF THE GAMBIA re #1 MOTION to Issue Subpoena pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 MOTION to Take Deposition from Twitter, Inc. pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 MOTION for Discovery pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 (Reichler, Paul) |
| Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (zsb) |
| Filing fee received: $ 47, receipt number: 4616. (zsb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew B. Lowenstein on behalf of THE REPUBLIC OF THE GAMBIA (Lowenstein, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 WITHDRAWN PURSUANT TO DOCKET ENTRY NO. #3 . . . . . MOTION to Issue Subpoena pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782, MOTION to Take Deposition from Twitter, Inc. pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782, MOTION for Discovery pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 by THE REPUBLIC OF THE GAMBIA (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration of Paul S. Reichler in Support, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Service)(Reichler, Paul) Modified on 5/18/2020 (ztd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
