In Re: BRANDON MICHAEL JACOBS
In Re: BRANDON MICHAEL JACOBS
Case Number: 1:2020mc00037
Filed: June 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. (See order for details). Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 06/30/2020. (zsb)
June 30, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Amend Complaint (zsb)
June 30, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION to Continue with this Case without a Seal by BRANDON MICHAEL JACOBS (zsb)
June 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER denying #1 Motion for Leave to Place Case Under Seal. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on 06/15/2020. (Attachments: #1 Motion to Place Case Under Seal, #2 Complaint, #3 IFP) (zsb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: BRANDON MICHAEL JACOBS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: BRANDON MICHAEL JACOBS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?