PACIFIC INDEMNITY CO. v. HARRY & SONS, INC. et al
| PACIFIC INDEMNITY CO. |
| PANAGIOTIS BEKOS doing business as BEKOS CONTRACTING, LLC, HARRY & SONS, INC. doing business as HARRY & SONS CONTRACTING CO. and PANAGIOTIS BEKOS individually and doing business as BEKOS CONTRACTING, LLC |
| 1:2021cv00085 |
| January 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Beryl A Howell |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended pleadings/joinder of parties due by 12/31/2021; plaintiff's expert disclosures under Rule 26(a)(2) due by 2/28/2022; defendant's expert disclosures under Rule 26(a)(2) due by 4/29/2022; fact discovery due by 1/31/2022; all discovery due by 6/30/2022; joint status report due by 6/30/2022; dispositive motions due by 8/31/2022; oppositions to dispositive motions due by 9/14/2022; replies due by 9/21/2022. (ztg) |
MINUTE ORDER (paperless) ISSUING, upon consideration of the parties' #9 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) Report and Discovery Plan, the following SCHEDULING ORDER to control the timing of proceedings in this matter: (1) by December 31, 2021, the parties shall file any amendments to the pleadings and join any additional parties; (2) by February 28, 2022, plaintiffs shall make any expert disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2); (3) by April 29, 2022, defendant shall make any expert disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2); (4) by January 31, 2022, all fact discovery shall close; (5) by June 30, 2022, all discovery shall close, on which date the parties shall submit a joint status report advising the Court whether (a) the parties request referral for mediation or settlement, (b) the parties request a date for a pretrial conference, or (c) dispositive motions are anticipated; (6) by August 31, 2022, the parties shall file any dispositive motions; (7) by September 14, 2022, the parties shall file any oppositions; and (8) by September 21, 2022, the parties shall file any replies. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on February 18, 2021. (lcbah2)
|
| Filing 9 MEET AND CONFER STATEMENT. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Kurtz, Chad) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by PANAGIOTIS BEKOS.(Bredeck, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by HARRY & SONS, INC..(Bredeck, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. PANAGIOTIS BEKOS served on 1/14/2021, answer due 2/4/2021 (Kurtz, Chad) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. HARRY & SONS, INC. served on 1/14/2021, answer due 2/4/2021 (Kurtz, Chad) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on January 12, 2021. (lcbah2)
|
| Filing 3 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by PACIFIC INDEMNITY CO. (Kurtz, Chad) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to PANAGIOTIS BEKOS, HARRY & SONS, INC.. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PANAGIOTIS BEKOS, HARRY & SONS, INC. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8061579) filed by PACIFIC INDEMNITY CO.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Kurtz, Chad) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
