SANDHU v. POMPEO et al
| PARMJIT SANDHU |
| MIKE POMPEO, JEFFREY ROSEN, CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, III, MARIK STRING and PETE GAYNOR |
| 1:2021cv00157 |
| January 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Reggie B Walton |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER. In light of the plaintiff's #3 Notice of Dismissal Voluntarily Without Prejudice, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that this case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on March 9, 2021. (lcrbw3)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by PARMJIT SANDHU (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (7) Issued Electronically as to KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, III, PETE GAYNOR, MIKE POMPEO, JEFFREY ROSEN, MARIK STRING, CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Reggie B. Walton. (zsb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8086562) filed by PARMJIT SANDHU. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
