HANUMAN v. BLINKEN et al
| JEEVAN HANUMAN |
| ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MONTY WILKINSON, TRACY RENAUD, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, MARIK STRING and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS |
| 1:2021cv00491 |
| February 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Beryl A Howell |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by JEEVAN HANUMAN (Goldstein, Joshua) |
MINUTE ORDER (paperless) DISMISSING, upon consideration of plaintiff's #4 Notice of Dismissal Voluntarily Without Prejudice, this action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on March 11, 2021. (lcbah1)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on February 26, 2021. (lcbah1)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (7) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY J. BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, TRACY RENAUD, MARIK STRING, MONTY WILKINSON, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8244880) filed by JEEVAN HANUMAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
