YAICH v. SCALIA et al
NIZAR MICHAEL YAICH |
EUGENE SCALIA, AL STEWART, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and MARTY WALSH |
1:2021cv00669 |
March 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Randolph D Moss |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SUMMONS (3) REISSUED as to EUGENE SCALIA, AL STEWART, MARTY WALSH (adh, ) |
Summons (3) Issued as to EUGENE SCALIA, AL STEWART, MARTY WALSH. (ztd) |
Filing 3 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that, on or before June 8, 2021, Plaintiffs shall either cause process to be served upon Defendants and file proof of service as to each Defendant with the Court, or else establish good cause for the failure to do so. Failure to make such filings will result in dismissal of this case. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 4/2/2021. (lcrdm3) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 4/2/2021. (lcrdm3) |
Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number: 4616105255. (ztd) |
SUMMONS Not Issued as to DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, EUGENE SCALIA, AL STEWART (znmw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, EUGENE SCALIA, AL STEWART filed by NIZAR MICHAEL YAICH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ztd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.