DANCY HINES et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLIAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
| Anthony Dancy and Carla Dancy Hines |
| WMATA and WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY |
| 1:2021cv00679 |
| March 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Dabney L Friedrich |
| P.I.: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
Receipt on 05/12/2021 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 2021 CA 000283 B. (zjf)
|
|
Filing 16
Memorandum in opposition to re #13 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by ANTHONY DANCY, CARLA DANCY HINES. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Costello, John) Modified docket event/text on 5/11/2021 (eg).
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 5/11/2021 (zjch)
|
|
Filing 15
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by ANTHONY DANCY, CARLA DANCY HINES. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Costello, John)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER granting the plaintiffs' #15 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. It is ORDERED that the plaintiffs shall file their response on or before May 11, 2021. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on May 3, 2021. (lcdlf2)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Andrew Nace on behalf of ANTHONY DANCY (Nace, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Amirthalingam, Nimalan)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 4/20/2021, (zjch)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER granting the defendant's #12 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint. The defendant shall answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to the plaintiffs' amended complaint on or before April 20, 2021. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on April 7, 2021. (lcdlf2)
|
|
Filing 12
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Amirthalingam, Nimalan)
|
|
Motion(s) terminated: #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY. Denied as moot by minute order dated April 1, 2021. (lcdlf2)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer or Responsive Pleading due by 4/13/2021. (zjd)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot the defendant's #9 Motion to Dismiss in light of the plaintiff's #10 Amended Complaint. The defendant shall file an answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint on or before April 13, 2021. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on April 1, 2021. (lcdlf2)
|
|
Filing 11
RESPONSE re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by ANTHONY DANCY, CARLA DANCY HINES. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Costello, John)
|
|
Filing 10
AMENDED COMPLAINT against WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY with Jury Demand filed by CARLA DANCY HINES, ANTHONY DANCY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Praecipe, #2 Exhibit Redline Comparison)(Costello, John)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Dismiss by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Amirthalingam, Nimalan)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by John F. X. Costello on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Costello, John)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDARD ORDER for Civil Cases. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on March 17, 2021. (lcdlf2)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal (zsb)
|
|
Filing 5
CIVIL COVER SHEET by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY re #1 Notice of Removal filed by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY. Related document: #1 Notice of Removal filed by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY.(Amirthalingam, Nimalan)
|
|
Filing 4
ERRATA as to Corrected Notice of Removal to Comply with Local Civil R. 5.1(c) by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY re #1 Notice of Removal filed by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Amirthalingam, Nimalan)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (zsb)
|
|
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Notice of Removal; emailed to namirthalingam@bonnerkiernan.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. Blank or missing coversheet. Please use the cover sheet at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms & file using the event Civil Cover Sheet., 3. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zsb, )
|
|
Filing 3
LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by WMATA (Amirthalingam, Nimalan)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Nimalan Amirthalingam on behalf of WMATA (Amirthalingam, Nimalan)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from DC Superior Court, case number 2021 CA 000283 B Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADCDC-8302751 filed by WMATA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Amirthalingam, Nimalan)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
