HINTON v. MCKISSACK & MCKISSACK OF WASHINGTON P.C.
Raynell Hinton |
MCKISSACK & MCKISSACK OF WASHINGTON INC and MCKISSACK & MCKISSACK OF WASHINGTON P.C. |
1:2021cv00738 |
March 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Carl J Nichols |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by MCKISSACK & MCKISSACK OF WASHINGTON P.C. (Janson, Eric) |
Filing 8 COUNTERCLAIM against RAYNELL HINTON filed by MCKISSACK & MCKISSACK OF WASHINGTON P.C..(Janson, Eric) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by MCKISSACK & MCKISSACK OF WASHINGTON P.C..(Janson, Eric) |
MINUTE ORDER. Upon review of Defendant's Consent Motion for Extension of Time, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by May 17, 2021. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on April 28, 2021. (lccjn3) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint by MCKISSACK & MCKISSACK OF WASHINGTON P.C.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Janson, Eric) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. MCKISSACK & MCKISSACK OF WASHINGTON P.C. served on 4/5/2021, answer due 4/26/2021 (Zipin, Philip) Modified served/due date on 4/16/2021 (eg). |
NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: re #4 Writ Executed was entered in error and counsel was instructed to refile said pleading using correct event type. (eg) |
Filing 4 ENTERED IN ERROR.....Writ Returned Executed on 4/5/2021. (Zipin, Philip) Modified on 4/16/2021 (zeg). |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to MCKISSACK & MCKISSACK OF WASHINGTON P.C.. (adh, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (zsb) |
Filing 2 ERRATA Resubmitted Complaint by RAYNELL HINTON re #1 Complaint filed by RAYNELL HINTON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zipin, Philip) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to pzipin@zagfirm.com, cc'd 1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Blank or missing coversheet. Please use the cover sheet at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms & file using the event Civil Cover Sheet., 2. No signature. Please file the signed document using the event Errata. All filings must have an original signature or '/s/ Attorney Name' to represent an electronic signature of the filer., 3. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zsb, ) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to pzipin@zagfirm.com, cc'd 1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Blank or missing coversheet. Please use the cover sheet at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms & file using the event Civil Cover Sheet., 2. No signature. Please file the signed document using the event Errata. All filings must have an original signature or '/s/ Attorney Name' to represent an electronic signature of the filer., 3. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zsb, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Raynell Hinton ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8317029) filed by Raynell Hinton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Zipin, Philip) (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/30/2021) (znmw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.