KHAN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
| SHAH ZAIB KHAN |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, CATHERINE RODRIGUEZ, U.S. CONSULATE, LAHORE, PAKISTAN, TRACY RENAUD, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, ANTONY BLINKEN, U.S. CONSULATE and ANGELA AGGELER |
| 1:2021cv00759 |
| March 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| James E Boasberg |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by SHAH ZAIB KHAN (Hacking, James) |
MINUTE ORDER: Per Plaintiff's #7 Notice, the Court ORDERS that the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 5/4/2021. (lcjeb2)
|
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANGELA AGGELER served on 4/7/2021; ANTONY J. BLINKEN served on 4/7/2021; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS served on 3/30/2021; U.S. CONSULATE, ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN served on 4/7/2021; UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES served on 3/30/2021; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY served on 3/30/2021; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE served on 4/7/2021, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 03/31/2021., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 4/2/2021. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 6/1/2021.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Hacking, James) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to ANGELA AGGELER, U.S. CONSULATE, ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (10) Issued Electronically as to ANGELA AGGELER, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, TRACY RENAUD, U.S. CONSULATE, ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against ANGELA AGGELER, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, TRACY RENAUD, U.S. CONSULATE, ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE filed by SHAH ZAIB KHAN.(Hacking, James) |
| Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT against ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, TRACY RENAUD, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, ANGELA AGGELER, U.S. CONSULATE, ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN, REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE re #1 Complaint, Case Assigned/Reassigned filed by SHAH ZAIB KHAN. Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by SHAH ZAIB KHAN, Case Assigned/Reassigned. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Hacking, James) |
| Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (adh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8320607) filed by SHAH ZAIB KHAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons)(Hacking, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
