WILKINS v. SAUL
| CHERYL DENISE WILKINS |
| ANDREW SAUL |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2021cv00766 |
| March 23, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Dabney L Friedrich |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (3) Issued as to ANDREW SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General sent to the U.S. Marshals Service. (znmg) |
Filing 4
STANDARD ORDER for civil cases. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on May 17, 2021. (lcdlf3)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (zsb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign this action randomly to a District Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 5/12/21. (zgdf)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by CHERYL DENISE WILKINS. (zsb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL filed by CHERYL DENISE WILKINS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(zsb) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 03/23/2021. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
