AMARAL v. UNITED STATES
| UNITED STATES |
| BRETT AMARAL |
| 1:2021cv00802 |
| March 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Trevor N McFadden |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen DeGenaro on behalf of UNITED STATES (DeGenaro, Stephen) |
| Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. BRETT AMARAL served on 4/12/2021 (Herrick, Peter) |
| Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 4/6/2021. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 6/5/2021. (Herrick, Peter) |
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 03/31/2021. (Herrick, Peter) |
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 3/26/2021. (lctnm1)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to UNITED STATES, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 5 ERRATA Signed Cover Sheet by BRETT AMARAL. (Herrick, Peter) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (adh, ) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to pssherrick@gmail.com, cc'd -1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. No signature. Please file the signed document using the event Errata. All filings must have an original signature or '/s/ Attorney Name' to represent an electronic signature of the filer., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (adh, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Proposed Order by BRETT AMARAL (Herrick, Peter) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by BRETT AMARAL. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Herrick, Peter) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by BRETT AMARAL filed by BRETT AMARAL.(Herrick, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT MOTION TO SET ASIDE ADMINISTRATIVE FORFEITURE OF FUNDS FOR LACK OF NOTICE against UNITED STATES ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8329864) filed by BRETT AMARAL.(Herrick, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: AMARAL v. UNITED STATES | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES | |
| Represented By: | Stephen DeGenaro |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: BRETT AMARAL | |
| Represented By: | Peter S. Herrick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
