JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
| DOUGLAS JONES |
| THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, SERGEANT TIMOTHY EVANS, OFFICER LLOYD COWARD, III, TIMOTHY EVANS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and LLOYD COWARD, III |
| 1:2021cv00836 |
| March 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Receipt on 5/12/2021 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 2020 CA 004857 B. (zjf)
|
|
Filing 9
REPLY to opposition to motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by LLOYD COWARD, III, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, TIMOTHY EVANS. (Ulle, Margaret)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #8 Defendants' Motion to Extend the Time to Respond to the Opposition: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants shall have up to and including May 10, 2021, to file a reply in support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 5/4/2021. (lcrc3)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiffs opposition to Defendants motion to dismiss complaint by LLOYD COWARD, III, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, TIMOTHY EVANS. (Ulle, Margaret)
|
|
Filing 7
Memorandum in opposition to re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by DOUGLAS JONES. (Jackson, Martinis)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss by LLOYD COWARD, III, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, TIMOTHY EVANS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit DECLARATION)(Johnson, Stephanie)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 4/16/2021. (tj)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants shall respond to the Complaint on or before April 16, 2021. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 4/7/2021. (lcrc3)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Martinis Montrelle Jackson on behalf of DOUGLAS JONES (Jackson, Martinis)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal, (adh, )
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zsb)
|
|
Filing 3
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT by OFFICER LLOYD COWARD, III, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, SERGEANT TIMOTHY EVANS. (Johnson, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET by SERGEANT TIMOTHY EVANS, OFFICER LLOYD COWARD, III, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by SERGEANT TIMOTHY EVANS, OFFICER LLOYD COWARD, III, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Related document: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by SERGEANT TIMOTHY EVANS.(Johnson, Stephanie)
|
|
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Notice of Removal; emailed to stephanie.johnson1@dc.gov, cc'd 2 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Blank or missing coversheet. Please use the cover sheet at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms & file using the event Civil Cover Sheet., 2. Form filed as fillable PDF. Please file form in a non-fillable PDF format., 3. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zsb, )
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, case number 2020 CA 004857 B (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by SERGEANT TIMOTHY EVANS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Superior Court Documents Ex. 1)(Johnson, Stephanie)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
