TINIUS v. CHOI et al
DEVON TINIUS |
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and LUKE CHOI |
1:2021cv00907 |
April 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Amy Berman Jackson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by DEVON TINIUS.(DeVita, James) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to by DEVON TINIUS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order proposed order)(DeVita, James) |
Filing 12 Memorandum in opposition to re #7 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint filed by DEVON TINIUS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order proposed order)(DeVita, James) |
Filing 11 Receipt on 05/20/2021 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 2021 CA 000201 B. (zjf) |
Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on the Mayor of the District of Columbia. Date of Service Upon the Mayor for the District of Columbia on 3/4/21. (DeVita, James) |
Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the District of Columbia Attorney General. Date of Service Upon District of Columbia Attorney General 3/4/2021. Answer due for ALL D.C. DEFENDANTS by 3/25/2021. (DeVita, James) |
MINUTE ORDER. #8 Motion for a Ten Day Extension of Time is GRANTED. Plaintiff must respond to defendants' motion to dismiss by June 3, 2021. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 5/21/2021. (lcabj1) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint by DEVON TINIUS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order proposed order)(DeVita, James) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint by LUKE CHOI, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Trout, Matthew) |
MINUTE ORDER. #6 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Defendants must respond to plaintiff's complaint by May 10, 2021. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 4/9/2021. (lcabj1) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by LUKE CHOI, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Trout, Matthew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal, (zsb) |
Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (zsb) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Case related to Case No. 1:21-cv-909. (Trout, Matthew) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA filed by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.(Trout, Matthew) |
Filing 2 ERRATA by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA re Notice of QC- New Case,,. (Attachments: #1 Errata)(Trout, Matthew) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Notice of Removal; emailed to matthew.trout1@dc.gov, cc'd 1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. Incorrect coversheet. Please use the cover sheet at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms & file using the event Civil Cover Sheet., 3. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zsb, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from D.C. Superior Court, case number 2021 CA 000201 B (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Superior Court Documents, #3 Superior Court Documents)(Trout, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.