LI et al v. RENAUD et al
| XUN ZHAO and YING LI |
| CONNIE NOLAN, TRACY RENAUD and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS |
| 1:2021cv00933 |
| April 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS served on 5/15/2021 (Newbold, Samuel) |
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. CONNIE NOLAN served on 5/18/2021 (Newbold, Samuel) |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. TRACY RENAUD served on 5/17/2021 (Newbold, Samuel) |
Filing 6
ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 04/16/2021.(DM)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, CONNIE NOLAN, TRACY RENAUD. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, Tracy Renaud filed by XUN ZHAO, YING LI. (Attachments: #1 Summons Connie Nolan, #2 Summons Tracy Renaud)(Newbold, Samuel) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus; emailed to snewbold@csglaw.com, cc'd -1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Missing/incorrect summonses. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to issue., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (adh, ) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE to Alejandro Mayorkas filed by XUN ZHAO, YING LI. (Attachments: #1 Request for Summons to Issue to Connie Nolan, #2 Request for Summons to Issue to Tracy Renaud)(Newbold, Samuel) |
| Filing 2 ERRATA CIVIL COVER SHEET by YING LI, XUN ZHAO. (Newbold, Samuel) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus; emailed to snewbold@csglaw.com, cc'd -1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Attorney is provisional. Please renew your membership. See https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-and-renewal-information., 2. No signature. Please file the signed document using the event Errata. All filings must have an original signature or '/s/ Attorney Name' to represent an electronic signature of the filer., 3. Form filed as fillable PDF. Please file form in a non-fillable PDF format., 4. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (adh, ) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus; emailed to snewbold@csglaw.com, cc'd -1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Missing/incorrect summonses. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to issue., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (adh, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (adh, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, CONNIE NOLAN, TRACY RENAUD ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8356203) filed by YING LI, XUN ZHAO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to Tracy Renaud, #3 Summons to Connie Nolan, #4 Summons to Alejandro Mayorkas)(Newbold, Samuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
