SANDVIK MINING AND CONSTRUCTION USA, LLC et al v. GARLAND et al
SANDVIK MINING AND CONSTRUCTION USA, LLC and RODOLFO GIANCOTTI REZENDE |
TRACY RENAUD, ROSEMARY LANGLEY MELVILLE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and MERRICK GARLAND |
1:2021cv00992 |
April 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Richard J Leon |
Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, ROSEMARY LANGLEY MELVILLE, TRACY RENAUD. (zjf) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by SANDVIK MINING AND CONSTRUCTION USA, LLC, RODOLFO GIANCOTTI REZENDE.(Loughran, Robert) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to MERRICK B. GARLAND. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
SUMMONS Not Issued as to ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, ROSEMARY LANGLEY MELVILLE, TRACY RENAUD, and U.S. ATTORNEY. (znmg) |
Case Assigned to Judge Richard J. Leon. (znmg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8365031) filed by SANDVIK MINING AND CONSTRUCTION USA, LLC, RODOLFO GIANCOTTI REZENDE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Summons, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Loughran, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.