WALKER v. SAUL
| ERROL WALKER |
| ANDREW M. SAUL |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2021cv01020 |
| April 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| John D Bates |
| Robin M Meriweather |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
CASE RANDOMLY REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Robin M. Meriweather for full case management. (zsb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for full case management up to and excluding trial. See text of Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 04/22/2021. (lcjdb2)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (zsb)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's motion #2 to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk shall assign this case to a district judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 4/21/2021.(psu1)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ERROL WALKER. (zsb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL filed by ERROL WALKER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(zsb)
|
|
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 04/13/2021. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
