GRANT II v. BAKER III
Plaintiff: WILLIAM LEE GRANT II and WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Defendant: JAMES A BAKER III and JAMES A. BAKER, III
Case Number: 1:2021cv01173
Filed: April 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Amy Berman Jackson
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against JAMES A. BAKER, III filed by WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II. (See Docket Entry #12 pages 10-41 to view document)(zjf)
June 22, 2021 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's motion #12 for leave to file an Amended Complaint [Dkt. 12 at 10-41] is GRANTED, and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #5 is DENIED as moot. In support of any renewed motion to dismiss, Defendant may resubmit its prior Memorandum of Points and Authorities. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 6/22/2021.(psu1)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II. (zjf)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 RESPONSE (OBJECTION) re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II. (zjf)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REPLY to opposition to motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by JAMES A. BAKER, III. (Jones, Sian)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Memorandum in opposition to re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II. "File as Opposition to Baker's Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim" Signed by Amy B. Jackson, U.S.D.J. on 06/02/2021 (zjf)
June 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Receipt on 05/21/2021 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number: 2021 CA 000572 B. (zjf)
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order advising plaintiff to respond by June 14, 2021, to defendant's motion to dismiss or risk dismissal of the case based on defendant's assertions (see document for details). Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 5/24/2021.(psu1)
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by JAMES A. BAKER, III. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Sian)
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Pro Se Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's #5 Motion to Dismiss is due by 6/14/2021. (jth)
May 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 05/03/2021., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 5/3/2021. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 7/2/2021.) (zjf)
May 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Sian Jones on behalf of JAMES A. BAKER, III (Jones, Sian)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal (adh, )
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (adh, )
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ERRATA by JAMES A BAKER III. (Attachments: #1 Noticec of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jones, Sian)
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Notice of Removal; emailed to sian.jones@usdoj.gov, cc'd -1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Filing fee not paid. Please remit payment using the event Payment of Fee-Complaint., 2. No signature. Please file the signed document using the event Errata. All filings must have an original signature or '/s/ Attorney Name' to represent an electronic signature of the filer., 3. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (adh, )
April 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the District of Columbia, case number 2021 CA 000572 B (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by JAMES A BAKER III. (Attachments: #1 Superior Court Documents Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jones, Sian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GRANT II v. BAKER III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM LEE GRANT II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES A BAKER III
Represented By: Sian Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES A. BAKER, III
Represented By: Sian Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?