MUHSEN et al v. GARLAND et al
| AMIRA MUHSEN, ZAID M ABDEL HAQ and ZAID M. ATIEH ABDEL HAQ |
| ANTONY BLINKEN, TRACY RENAUD, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, MERRICK GARLAND, CONN SCHRADER and HENRY WOODSTER |
| 1:2021cv01212 |
| May 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Beryl A Howell |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on May 6, 2021. (lcbah1)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (8) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY BLINKEN, MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, TRACY RENAUD, CONN SCHRADER, HENRY WOODSTER, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell. (adh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MERRICK GARLAND ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8423514) filed by AMIRA MUHSEN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Appearance of Counsel, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit Exhibit D, #7 Summons Alejandro Mayorkas, #8 Summons Anthony Blinken, #9 Summons Channing Phillips, #10 Summons Christopher Wray, #11 Summons Conn Schrader, #12 Summons Henry Woodster, #13 Summons Merrick Garland, #14 Summons Tracy Renaud)(Zambrano, Shirley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
