JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
| JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. |
| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE |
| 1:2021cv01225 |
| May 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amy Berman Jackson |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER. Before the Court in this FOIA case are a complaint and an answer. The requirements of Local Civil Rule 16.3 and Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure appear to be inapplicable. Defendant shall file a dispositive motion or, in the alternative, a report setting forth the schedule for the completion of its production of documents to plaintiff, on or before July 6, 2021. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 6/8/2021. (lcabj1)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Valdivia, Diana) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Diana Viggiano Valdivia on behalf of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (Valdivia, Diana) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE served on 5/10/2021 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Rothstein)(Orfanedes, Paul) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 05/13/21. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Rothstein)(Orfanedes, Paul) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 5/6/2021. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 6/5/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Rothstein)(Orfanedes, Paul) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. (Orfanedes, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8427009) filed by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for US Attorney for DC, #3 Summons for US Attorney General, #4 Summons for U.S. Department of Defense)(Orfanedes, Paul) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (znmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE | |
| Represented By: | Diana Viggiano Valdivia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Paul J. Orfanedes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
