SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
| JAMIE DAVIS SMITH |
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
| 1:2021cv01236 |
| May 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| G Michael Harvey |
| Timothy J Kelly |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE by JAMIE DAVIS SMITH. (Houck, Carolyn) |
MINUTE ORDER. The parties submitted a joint proposed briefing schedule. ECF No. 7. Upon review of the proposed schedule, the undersigned adopts the proposed briefing schedule. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file her motion for attorney's fees on August 27, 2021, Defendant shall file its response on September 16, 2021, and Plaintiff shall file her reply on October 8, 2021. It is further ORDERED that the scheduling conference set for 6/10/2021 is VACATED. SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey on 6/9/2021. (lcew)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles A. Sibert on behalf of JAMIE DAVIS SMITH (Sibert, Charles) |
| Set/Reset Hearings: Scheduling Conference set for 6/10/2021 at 10:00 AM in Telephonic/VTC before Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey. (lcew) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.(Porter, Veronica) |
| CASE RANDOMLY REFERRED to Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey for Full Case Management. (znmg) |
|
MINUTE ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: It is hereby ORDERED, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.2, that this action is referred to a magistrate judge, to be randomly assigned by the Clerk's Office, for full case management up to and excluding trial. This includes, with respect to any potentially dispositive motion, the preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.3. It is further ORDERED that any future filings related to this matter shall have the initials of the presiding district judge and the assigned magistrate judge following the case number in the caption. The parties are reminded that, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 73.1, this action may be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for all purposes, including trial, upon the filing of an executed notice of consent by all parties; consent of the presiding district judge is not necessary. The parties are hereby advised, however, that they may decline to consent to such a referral without adverse substantive consequences. Local Civil Rule 73.1(b). Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 5/7/2021. (lctjk1)
|
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on the Mayor of the District of Columbia. Date of Service Upon the Mayor for the District of Columbia on 5/6/21. (Houck, Carolyn) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the District of Columbia Attorney General. Date of Service Upon District of Columbia Attorney General 5/6/2021. Answer due for ALL D.C. DEFENDANTS by 5/27/2021. (Houck, Carolyn) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to District of Columbia Attorney General and the District of Columbia Mayor. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8428964) filed by JAMIE DAVIS SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons AG, #3 Summons Mayor, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2)(Houck, Carolyn) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (znmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JAMIE DAVIS SMITH | |
| Represented By: | Carolyn W. Houck |
| Represented By: | Charles A. Sibert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | |
| Represented By: | Veronica A. Porter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
