BERTOLA v. BLINKEN et al
| MARCOS BERTOLA |
| ANTONY BLINKEN and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE |
| 1:2021cv01435 |
| May 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 06/08/2021. (Kuck, Charles) |
Filing 3
ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 6/10/21. (DM)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY J. BLINKEN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, and U.S. Attorney. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (znmg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus and for Declaratory Relief against ANTONY BLINKEN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8483972) filed by MARCOS BERTOLA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Summons, #14 Summons, #15 Summons)(Kuck, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
