GRAHAM et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
I. D. and IVYETTE GRAHAM |
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
1:2021cv01584 |
June 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Royce C Lamberth |
Education |
20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion for attorney's fees due by 10/15/2021. Defendant's Response due by 11/12/2021. Reply due by 12/3/2021. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 7/23/2021. (lcrcl2) Modified on 7/27/2021 (lsj). Modified to remove "minute" on 7/27/2021 (znmw). |
Filing 5 MEET AND CONFER STATEMENT. (Jones, Robert) |
Filing 4 ORDER The Parties shall meet and confer and file (1) written report outlining their discovery plan and (2) a proposed scheduling order. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 07/09/2021. (lcrcl2) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.(Hardy, Tasha) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, District of Columbia Attorney General, and the District of Columbia Mayor. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8516448) filed by IVYETTE GRAHAM, I. D.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Jones, Robert) |
Case Assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.