WU v. RENAUD et al
CHAI FANG FABIOLA FUNG WU |
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, TRACY RENAUD and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS |
1:2021cv01718 |
June 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Royce C Lamberth |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, TRACY RENAUD, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth. (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR MANDAMUS AND DECLARATORY RELIEF against ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, TRACY RENAUD, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8560951) filed by CHAI FANG FABIOLA FUNG WU. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Tracy Renaud, Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, in her official capacity, #3 Summons Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, #4 Summons United States Citizenship And Immigration Services, #5 Summons United States Department Of Homeland Security)(Antonelli, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.