VIINETWORK, INC. v. VEEMED, INC.
VIINETWORK, INC. doing business as VIIMED |
VEEMED, INC. |
1:2021cv01736 |
June 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Amy Berman Jackson |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 FINAL REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a patent and/or trademark. (znmw) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by VIINETWORK, INC. (Hollywood, Meegan) |
MINUTE ORDER granting joint #8 motion for extension of time. It is ORDERED that the parties must file a status report by October 15, 2021, if the case has not been dismissed in the interim. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 9/17/21. (lcabj2) |
Filing 8 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by VEEMED, INC.. (Scully, Elizabeth) |
NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: Document No. re #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, was entered in error and refiled by counsel. (See Docket Entry #7 to view document)(zjf) |
MINUTE ORDER granting defendant's #7 motion for extension of time. It is ORDERED that defendant must answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by September 15, 2021. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 8/17/21. (lcabj2) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by VEEMED, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order PROPOSED ORDER)(Scully, Elizabeth) |
Filing 6 ENTERED IN ERROR.....Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by VEEMED, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order PROPOSED ORDER)(Scully, Elizabeth) Modified on 8/17/2021 (zjf). |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. VEEMED, INC. served on 7/26/2021, answer due 8/16/2021 (Hollywood, Meegan) |
Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a patent and/or trademark. (znmw) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to VEEMED, INC.. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (znmg) |
Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by VIINETWORK, INC. (Hollywood, Meegan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against VEEMED, INC. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8565518) filed by VIINETWORK, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Summons)(Hollywood, Meegan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: VIINETWORK, INC. v. VEEMED, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: VIINETWORK, INC. doing business as VIIMED | |
Represented By: | Meegan F. Hollywood |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: VEEMED, INC. | |
Represented By: | Elizabeth Anne Scully |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.