FREEMAN v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
| ALICE M. FREEMAN |
| GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
| 1:2021cv01775 |
| July 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Reggie B Walton |
| Personal Property: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
AMENDED COMPLAINT against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA filed by ALICE M. FREEMAN. (ztth)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the plaintiff's #2 Motion to Amend Pleading, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 2-1, is ACCEPTED AS FILED, and the Clerk of the Court shall file it as a separate entry on the docket. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall forthwith mail a copy of this Minute Order to the plaintiff's address on record. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on August 11, 2021. (lcrbw2)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by ALICE M. FREEMAN. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit) (ztth)
|
|
Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number: 200178. (ztth)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA filed by ALICE M. FREEMAN. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ztth)
|
|
Summons (1) Issued as to GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (ztth)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
