GALVIN v. HARKER et al
| MAJ. FRED C. GALVIN and FRED C. GALVIN |
| THOMAS W. HARKER and LLOYD AUSTIN |
| 1:2021cv01813 |
| July 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| John D Bates |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by LLOYD AUSTIN, THOMAS W. HARKER. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Knapp, Michael)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Fraser Knapp on behalf of All Defendants (Knapp, Michael)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of #11 defendants' Unopposed Motion to Extend Responsive Pleading Deadline, and the entire record herein, the motion is hereby GRANTED; and it is further ordered that defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint by not later than September 24, 2021. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 9/3/2021. (lcjdb3)
|
|
Filing 9
SEALED DOCUMENT filed by FRED C. GALVIN re Order,, (This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Orfanedes, Paul)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of #2 plaintiff's motion for relief from Local Civil Rule 11.1, and the entire record herein, the motion is GRANTED IN PART; it is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be permitted to redact or omit personal information in the caption of his complaint filed on the public docket; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff shall file under seal a complaint containing all information required by Local Civil Rule 11.1. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 8/12/2021. (lcjdb3).
|
|
Filing 8
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. LLOYD AUSTIN served on 7/16/2021 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Rothstein)(Orfanedes, Paul)
|
|
Filing 7
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. THOMAS W. HARKER served on 7/16/2021 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Rothstein)(Orfanedes, Paul)
|
|
Filing 6
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 07/19/21. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Rothstein)(Orfanedes, Paul)
|
|
Filing 5
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 7/12/2021. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 9/10/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Rothstein)(Orfanedes, Paul)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to LLOYD AUSTIN, THOMAS W. HARKER, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, )
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (adh, )
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Meredith Leigh Di Liberto on behalf of MAJ. FRED C. GALVIN (Di Liberto, Meredith)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Order for Relief from Local Civil Rule 11.1 by MAJ. FRED C. GALVIN. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Orfanedes, Paul)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against LLOYD AUSTIN, THOMAS W. HARKER ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8582582) filed by MAJ. FRED C. GALVIN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons for U.S. Attorney for DC, #6 Summons for U.S. Attorney General, #7 Summons for Thomas W. Harker, #8 Summons for Lloyd Austin)(Orfanedes, Paul)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
