CROSS OIL REFINING & MARKETING, INC. v. REGAN
CROSS OIL REFINING & MARKETING, INC. |
MICHAEL S. REGAN |
1:2021cv01825 |
July 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Tanya S Chutkan |
Jia M Cobb |
Environmental Matters |
42 U.S.C. § 7545 Air Pollution Prevention - Regulation of Fuels |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ORDER granting #20 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Bill of Costs and Request for Attorneys' Fees: Having considered the motion and for good cause shown, the Court grants the motion. Plaintiff shall file its bill of costs and requests for attorney fees by July 18, 2022. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on May 11, 2022. (lcjmc1) |
Filing 20 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Bill of Costs and Request for Attorneys' Fees by CROSS OIL REFINING & MARKETING, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DeLaquil, Mark) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting #11 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and denying #13 Defendant's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment as moot: See document for details. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on May 5, 2022. (lcjmc1) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION: See document for details. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on May 5, 2022. (lcjmc1) |
Filing 17 REPLY to opposition to motion re #13 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment on Remedy filed by MICHAEL S. REGAN. (Izfar, Sarah) |
Filing 16 REPLY to opposition to motion re #11 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by CROSS OIL REFINING & MARKETING, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Errata B, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(DeLaquil, Mark) |
Filing 15 Memorandum in opposition to re #13 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment on Remedy filed by CROSS OIL REFINING & MARKETING, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Statement of Facts (Response to Def's Facts), #4 Text of Proposed Order)(DeLaquil, Mark) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE re #11 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by MICHAEL S. REGAN. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Facts Ex. A: EPA's Statement of Facts, #2 Affidavit Ex. B: Bunker Decl., #3 Exhibit Ex. C: Proposed SRE Denial, #4 Exhibit Ex. D: Sinclair Order, #5 Exhibit Ex. E: April 2022 SRE Denial, #6 Text of Proposed Order)(Izfar, Sarah) |
Filing 13 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment on Remedy by MICHAEL S. REGAN. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Facts Ex. A: EPA's Statement of Facts, #2 Affidavit Ex. B: Bunker Decl., #3 Ex. C: Proposed SRE Denial, #4 Ex. D: Sinclair Order, #5 Ex. E: April 2022 SRE Denial, #6 Text of Proposed Order)(Izfar, Sarah) |
Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 MOTION for Summary Judgment by MICHAEL S. REGAN. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Izfar, Sarah) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #12 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment: Having considered the motion and for good cause shown, the motion is granted. Defendant is ordered to respond to #11 Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment by April 18, 2022. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on April 6, 2022. (lcjmc1) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Summary Judgment by CROSS OIL REFINING & MARKETING, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Facts, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(DeLaquil, Mark) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by MICHAEL S. REGAN.(Izfar, Sarah) |
MINUTE ORDER: The order entered earlier today (February 17, 2022) is VACATED. The dispositive-motions schedule in the Court's January 20, 2022, scheduling minute order remains in effect. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on February 17, 2022. (lcjmc1) Modified on 2/18/2022, to make a correction. (zgdf). |
VACATED PURSUANT TO THE MINUTE ORDER ENTERED ON 2/17/22.....MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that the Parties confer and submit a joint proposed schedule for further proceedings, which shall include a proposed schedule for briefing dispositive motions, by March 3, 2022. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on February 17, 2022. (lcjmc1) Modified on 2/18/2022 (zgdf). |
Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS before Judge Jia M. Cobb held on January 20, 2022; Page Numbers: 1-18. Date of Issuance: February 4, 2022. Court Reporter: Janice Dickman, Telephone number: 202-354-3267, Transcripts may be ordered by submitting the #Transcript Order FormFor the first 90 days after this filing date, the transcript may be viewed at the courthouse at a public terminal or purchased from the court reporter referenced above . After 90 days, the transcript may be accessed via PACER. Other transcript formats, (multi-page, condensed, CD or ASCII) may be purchased from the court reporter.NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have twenty-one days to file with the court and the court reporter any request to redact personal identifiers from this transcript. If no such requests are filed, the transcript will be made available to the public via PACER without redaction after 90 days. The policy, which includes the five personal identifiers specifically covered, is located on our website at www.dcd.uscourts.gov. Redaction Request due 2/25/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/7/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/5/2022.(Dickman, Janice) |
SCHEDULING MINUTE ORDER: At the January 20, 2022, status conference, the Court lifted the stay in this case and the Parties proposed a schedule for further proceedings. The Court thus ORDERS Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's complaint by February 17, 2022. The Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's summary-judgment motion is due by March 10, 2022, and Defendant's opposition to Plaintiff's summary-judgment motion is due by April 11, 2022. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on January 20, 2022. (lcjmc1) Modified event title on 1/24/2022 (znmw). |
Minute Entry for Telephone Status Conference before Judge Jia M. Cobb held on 1/20/2022.Oral order of the lifting the stay of the case. Scheduling order forthcoming via Chambers. (Court Reporter Janice Dickman) (zgdf) |
MINUTE ORDER: In light of the status conference on January 20, 2022, the Parties are not required to file a joint status report on January 18, 2022. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on January 10, 2022. (lcjmc1) |
MINUTE ORDER setting Status Conference for Thursday, January 20, 2022, at 10AM before Judge Jia M. Cobb. The status conference will be on the record and conducted via telephone. The Court's Deputy Clerk will provide the information necessary to access the call. The Parties should be prepared to present their positions on whether the Court should lift the stay in this case, as discussed in #8 Joint Status Report, and, should the Court lift the stay, to propose a schedule for future proceedings. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on January 6, 2022. (lcjmc1) |
Filing 8 Joint STATUS REPORT by MICHAEL S. REGAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Denial)(Izfar, Sarah) |
Case directly reassigned to Judge Jia M. Cobb. Judge Tanya S. Chutkan is no longer assigned to the case. (rj) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Status Report due by 12/16/2021. (tb) |
MINUTE ORDER: Granting Joint Motion to Stay #7 . This action is STAYED pending further order of the court. By 12/16/21 and every 30 days thereafter, the parties shall file a joint status. To the extent the parties propose a change in the status quo, the report shall be accompanied by a proposed order. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 9/25/21. (DJS) |
Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Stay Action by MICHAEL S. REGAN. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Izfar, Sarah) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Izfar on behalf of All Defendants (Izfar, Sarah) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 7/19/2021. (DeLaquil, Mark) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 7/19/2021. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 9/17/2021. (DeLaquil, Mark) |
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. MICHAEL S. REGAN served on 7/20/2021 (DeLaquil, Mark) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to MICHAEL S. REGAN, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (znmg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MICHAEL S. REGAN ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8586169) filed by CROSS OIL REFINING & MARKETING, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons US Attny, #5 Summons US AG, #6 Summons Admin. Regan)(DeLaquil, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CROSS OIL REFINING & MARKETING, INC. v. REGAN | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CROSS OIL REFINING & MARKETING, INC. | |
Represented By: | Mark Wendell DeLaquil |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MICHAEL S. REGAN | |
Represented By: | Sarah Izfar |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.