ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
| ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION |
| UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE |
| 1:2021cv02024 |
| July 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Timothy J Kelly |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER: Before the Court in this FOIA case are a complaint and an answer. The Government #8 has notified the Court that Judge Kollar-Kotelly has denied its motion to consolidate this case with Judicial Watch, Inc., No. 21-cv-1753. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall meet, confer, and file a joint proposed schedule for briefing or disclosure by October 11, 2021. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 9/24/2021. (lctjk1)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Ruling on Motion to Consolidate Cases by UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Saslaw, Alexandra) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing of Motion to Consolidate Cases by UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Saslaw, Alexandra) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE.(Saslaw, Alexandra) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 8/2/2021, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE served on 8/6/2021. (See Docket Entry #4 to see document). (ztth) Modified on 8/17/2021 (znmw). |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 8/2/2021. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 9/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Mailing)(Sobel, David) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION (Sobel, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8625714) filed by ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION. (Attachments: #1 Summons USPS, #2 Summons US Attorney General, #3 Summons US Attorney for DC, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sobel, David) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION | |
| Represented By: | David L. Sobel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE | |
| Represented By: | Alexandra Rachel Saslaw |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
