NDOMBE HARDING v. GARLAND et al
| NANA N. NDOMBE HARDING |
| MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, DESHAWNA WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and ALEJANDRO J. MAYORKAS |
| 1:2021cv02069 |
| August 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Consent to a Magistrate Judge's Authority by NANA N. NDOMBE HARDING (Lu, Lucy) |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 08/02/2021. (lcrdm3)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to MERRICK GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DESHAWNA WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHER WRAY. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zsb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Mandamus Action against MERRICK GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DESHAWNA WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHER WRAY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8637624) filed by NANA NICOLE NDOMBE HARDING. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(Lu, Lucy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
