AMERICAN OVERSIGHT v. U.S. CENSUS BUREAU
| AMERICAN OVERSIGHT |
| U.S. CENSUS BUREAU |
| 1:2021cv02082 |
| August 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER. The parties shall submit an additional Joint Status Report by November 12, 2021, which updates the court on the processing and production of responsive records. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 9/30/2021. (lcapm2)
|
| Filing 7 Joint STATUS REPORT by U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. (Robinson, John) |
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #6 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Joint Status Report. The parties' Joint Status Report shall now be due on or before September 29, 2021. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 9/19/2021. (lcapm2)
|
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Joint Status Report by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lewis, Emma) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER. Both a Complaint and an Answer are now before the court in this FOIA case. It is hereby ordered that the parties shall meet and confer and file a Joint Status Report on or before September 27, 2021. The Joint Status Report shall include (1) the status of Plaintiff's FOIA request; (2) the anticipated number of documents responsive to Plaintiff's FOIA request; (3) the anticipated date(s) for release of the documents requested by Plaintiff; (4) whether a motion for stay is likely under Open America v. Watergate Special Prosecution Force, 547 F.2d 605 (D.C. Cir. 1976); and (5) whether the parties anticipate summary judgment briefing and, if so, a proposed briefing schedule. See the attached Order for details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 9/13/2021. (lcapm2)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by U.S. CENSUS BUREAU.(Robinson, John) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to U.S. CENSUS BUREAU, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT (Lewis, Emma) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. CENSUS BUREAU ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8643307) filed by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons USAO, #3 Summons AG, #4 Summons Census Bureau)(Lewis, Emma) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: AMERICAN OVERSIGHT v. U.S. CENSUS BUREAU | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: AMERICAN OVERSIGHT | |
| Represented By: | Emma Lewis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. CENSUS BUREAU | |
| Represented By: | John Robinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
