MATIELLA v. MURDOCK STREET LLC
| CHARLES MATIELLA |
| MURDOCK STREET LLC |
| 1:2021cv02112 |
| August 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Tanya S Chutkan |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MEET AND CONFER STATEMENT. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order [Proposed] Scheduling Order)(Chase, Kenneth)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: No later than 10/1/21 the parties shall meet, confer and file their joint Report of the Parties' Planning Meeting, pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 16.3. The Report shall include a proposed Scheduling Order in the format found on Judge Chutkan's court webpage, along with any proposed changes which shall be highlighted. On the same day that the parties file their Rule 26 report and proposed Scheduling Order, the parties shall also email a Word version of the proposed order to Chambers. When proposing deadlines, the parties shall avoid proposing a schedule that contains submission of simultaneous dispositive cross-motions. In addition to the requirements under the Federal and Local Rules, the parties' report shall contain a succinct summary of the case and the statutory basis for all causes of action and defenses. Separate Reports will be stricken, sua sponte. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 9/23/21. (DJS)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Meet & Confer Statement due by 10/1/2021. (tb)
|
|
Filing 5
First ANSWER to Complaint by MURDOCK STREET LLC.(Moiz, Ibrahim)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 9/22/2021. (tb)
|
|
Filing 4
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by MURDOCK STREET LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Moiz, Ibrahim)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: Granting Unopposed #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 9/22/21. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 9/8/21. (DJS)
|
|
Filing 3
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. MURDOCK STREET LLC served on 8/18/2021, answer due 9/8/2021 (Chase, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to MURDOCK STREET LLC. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Murdock Street LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8651180) filed by Charles Matiella. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Chase, Kenneth)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (adh, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MATIELLA v. MURDOCK STREET LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CHARLES MATIELLA | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth E. Chase |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MURDOCK STREET LLC | |
| Represented By: | Ibrahim A. Moiz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
