JOLLY et al v. KNIGHTSBRIDGE MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
RONALD JOLLY and AMIR ZIAGHAM |
KNIGHTSBRIDGE MANAGEMENT, INC. D/B/A KNIGHTSBRIDGE RESTAURANT GROUP, RASIKA WEST END, LLC, ASHOK BAJAJ and KNIGHTSBRIDGE MANAGEMENT, INC. doing business as KNIGHTSBRIDGE RESTAURANT GROUP |
1:2021cv02163 |
August 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Trevor N McFadden |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Status Report due by 12/21/2021. (hmc) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Michael O'Shea on behalf of ASHOK BAJAJ, KNIGHTSBRIDGE MANAGEMENT, INC., RASIKA WEST END, LLC (O'Shea, Brian) |
Filing 4 Joint MOTION to Stay by ASHOK BAJAJ, KNIGHTSBRIDGE MANAGEMENT, INC., RASIKA WEST END, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Calamis, Nat) |
|
Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
|
Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (znmg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class and Collective Action against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8665021) filed by RONALD JOLLY, AMIR ZIAGHAM. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons to Knightsbridge Restaurant Group, #3 Summons Summons to Rasika West End, LLC, #4 Summons Summons to Ashok Bajaj)(Amster, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.