WEIDRICK v. BIDEN, JR. et al
| MARY JO WEIDRICK |
| JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., UNITED STATES MILITARY, MERRICK GARLAND and UNITED STATES CONGRESS |
| 1:2021cv02224 |
| August 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. (See order for details) Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 09/23/2021. (znmg)
|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 09/23/2021. (znmg) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Expedite Complaint by MARY JO WEIDRICK. (znmg) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Expedite by MARY JO WEIDRICK. (See Docket Entry #1 to view document) (znmg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MARY JO WEIDRICK. (znmg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Motion to Expedite against All Defendants filed by MARY JO WEIDRICK. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Compliance, #2 Certificate of Service) (znmg) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 08/19/2021. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (znmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
