ERWIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
JOHN ERWIN |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARGERY LEMIEUX and JANE COLON |
1:2021cv02229 |
August 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re Receipt of Initiating Pleading & IFP Application. Sent to JOHN ERWIN;. (zsb) |
Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #5 Order Dismissing Pro Se Case, #4 Memorandum & Opinion Sent to JOHN ERWIN;. (zsb) |
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 08/31/2021. (zsb) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 08/31/2021. (zsb) |
Filing 3 MOTION for CM/ECF Password by JOHN ERWIN. (zsb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JOHN ERWIN. (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JANE COLON, MARGERY LEMIEUX, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA filed by JOHN ERWIN. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(zsb) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 08/19/2021. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.