HOMAEIFAR et al v. BLINKEN et al
| ROGHAYYEH HOMAEIFAR and MOHAMMAD KESHAVARZ TALEBI |
| ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, IAN G. BROWNLEE, DAVID M SATTERFIELD, JOHN DOE and DAVID M. SATTERFIELD |
| 1:2021cv02255 |
| August 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 8/30/2021. (DM)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IAN G. BROWNLEE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, DAVID M. SATTERFIELD, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (znmg) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IAN G. BROWNLEE, JOHN DOE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, DAVID M SATTERFIELD ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8689800) filed by ROGHAYYEH HOMAEIFAR, MOHAMMAD KESHAVARZ TALEBI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT B, #3 Summons SUMMONS BLINKEN, #4 Summons SUMMONS BROWNLEE, #5 Summons SUMMONS ATT GEN, #6 Summons SUMMONS SATTERFIELD, #7 Summons SUMMONS US ATT, #8 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER)(Jeelani, Hashim) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
