MCMILLAN v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
DAVID MCMILLAN |
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) |
1:2021cv02272 |
August 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Christopher R Cooper |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER setting Initial Scheduling Conference for November 18, 2021 at 2:00 PM by videoconference. See full Order for details. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 10/12/2021. (lccrc1) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK).(Ezeigbo, Ifeanyi) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) served on 9/1/2021, answer due 9/22/2021 (Duckworth, James) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK). (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE re Notice of QC- New Case, filed by DAVID MCMILLAN. Related document: Notice of QC- New Case,.(Duckworth, James) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #2 Request for Summons to Issue; emailed to jduckworth@keller-goggin.com, cc'd 3 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Missing/incorrect summonses. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to issue., 2. Please submit Summons AO 440., 3. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (znmg, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (znmg) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE re Notice of QC- New Case, filed by DAVID MCMILLAN. Related document: Notice of QC- New Case,.(Duckworth, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8694723) filed by DAVID MCMILLAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Duckworth, James) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to jduckworth@keller-goggin.com, cc'd 3 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Missing/incorrect summonses. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to issue., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (znmg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MCMILLAN v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DAVID MCMILLAN | |
Represented By: | James M. Duckworth |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) | |
Represented By: | Ifeanyi Olusegun Ezeigbo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.