I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND et al v. RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC.
I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND |
RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC. |
1:2021cv02375 |
September 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Royce C Lamberth |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. Answer due by 11/23/2021. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 10/20/2021. (lcrcl3) |
Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, or other Responsive Pleading by BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND, I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Shiffrin, Joshua) |
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC. served on 9/21/2021, answer due 10/12/2021 (Shiffrin, Joshua) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC.. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
Case Assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth. (znmg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8717176) filed by I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shiffrin, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.