RENFORD v. CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE
| STACIA RENFORD |
| CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, a division of Capital One, N.A. and CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE |
| 1:2021cv02382 |
| September 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
NOTICE by STACIA RENFORD. "LEAVE TO FILE GRANTED" by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 10/20/2021. (ztth)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to 12(b)(6) by STACIA RENFORD. "LEAVE TO FILE GRANTED AS A MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. MOTION GRANTED. PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE TO NOVEMBER 22, 2021 TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION." By Judge Rudolph Contreras on 10/20/2021.
|
|
Filing 9
Order advising plaintiff to respond by 10/22/2021 to #6 defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 9/28/21. (psu2)
|
|
Filing 10
(Second) MOTION for the case to remain open re #9 Fox/Neal Order by STACIA RENFORD. (ztth); Modified filed date on 9/30/2021 (ztth).
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for the case to remain open re #1 Notice of Removal, by STACIA RENFORD. "LEAVE TO FILE GRANTED" by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 9/23/2021. (ztth)
|
|
Filing 7
Receipt on 9/21/2021 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 2021 CA 2862 B. (ztth)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to 12(b)(6) by CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Sadler, John)
|
|
Filing 5
LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests (Capital One Financial Corporation (Parent); Capital One, N.A. (Affiliate)) by CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Sadler, John)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE to Counsel/Party re: #1 Notice of Removal. (znmg)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (znmg)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL COVER SHEET by CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE re Notice of QC- New Case, filed by CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE. Related document: Notice of QC- New Case,.(Sadler, John)
|
|
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Notice of Removal; emailed to sadlerj@ballardspahr.com, cc'd 1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Incorrect coversheet. Please use the cover sheet at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms & file using the event Civil Cover Sheet., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zsb, )
|
|
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Notice of Removal; emailed to sadlerj@ballardspahr.com, cc'd -1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Incorrect coversheet. Please use the cover sheet at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms & file using the event Civil Cover Sheet., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (adh, )
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by John Darren Sadler on behalf of CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, a division of Capital One, N.A. (Sadler, John)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the District of Columbia, case number 2021 CA 2862 B Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADCDC-8720863 filed by STACIA RENFORD. (Attachments: #1 Superior Court Documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sadler, John)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
