CATO INSTITUTE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
| CATO INSTITUTE |
| FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE |
| 1:2021cv02434 |
| September 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Beryl A Howell |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.(Simon, Jeremy) |
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on September 16, 2021. (lcbah4)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent) (znmg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Topic on behalf of CATO INSTITUTE (Topic, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua Hart Burday on behalf of CATO INSTITUTE (Burday, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8736544) filed by CATO INSTITUTE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons)(Burday, Joshua) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell. (znmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
