STEWART v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
| PASSION STEWART |
| UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE |
| 1:2021cv02573 |
| October 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| James E Boasberg |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #9 Leave to File Denied. Sent to Passion Stewart; Resent at New Address: 800 Kenilworth Avenue NE, Apt. 231, Washington, DC 20019. (ztth)
|
|
Filing 9
LEAVE TO FILE DENIED - FedEx Shipment receipt. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. "Leave to file DENIED. Case dismissed 10-15-21." Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/27/2021. (ztth)
|
|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM OPINION re #7 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/15/2021. (lcjeb3)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: The Court ORDERS that 1) Defendant's #3 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; and 2) The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/15/2021. (lcjeb3)
|
|
Filing 6
Memorandum in opposition to #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by PASSION STEWART. "Leave to file GRANTED" by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/14/2021. (ztth)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that Defendant need not file a reply to Plaintiff's opposition to its motion to dismiss. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/14/2021. (lcjeb3)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's #3 Motion to Dismiss the Complaint no later than November 2, 2021. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/12/2021. (lcjeb3)
|
|
Filing 4
Receipt on 10/07/2021 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number: 2021 CA 002953 B. (zjf)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 11/2/2021. (znbn)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Dismiss by UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit 1)(Weiner, Blake)
|
|
SUMMONS (2) Issued as to UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and U.S. Attorney General (zjf)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE to Counsel/Party re: #1 Notice of Removal. (znmg)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (znmg)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the District of Columbia, case number 2021 CA 002953 B (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. (Attachments: #1 Superior Court Documents (Complaint), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Weiner, Blake)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: STEWART v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PASSION STEWART | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE | |
| Represented By: | Blake A, Weiner |
| Represented By: | Blake A. Weiner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
