COLE v. HAINES et al
| BIANCA COLE |
| AVRIL HAINES, DAVID S. COHEN, BOOZE ALLEN HAMILTON, CACI INTERNATIONAL INC. and PERSPECTA/PERATON |
| 1:2021cv02599 |
| September 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Timothy J Kelly |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER. See order for details. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 10/11/2021. (lctjk2)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER denying Plaintiff's #2 Motion for CM/ECF Username and Password. Plaintiff's #2 Motion does not comply with Local Civil Rule 7(m), which requires in the motion a statement that Plaintiff has conferred with Defendants to "determine whether there is any opposition to the relief sought" and indicating "whether the motion is opposed." Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's #2 Motion is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 10/11/2021. (lctjk2)
|
| SUMMONS Not Issued as to BOOZE ALLEN HAMILTON, CACI INTERNATIONAL INC., DAVID S. COHEN, AVRIL HAINES, PERSPECTA/PERATON (ztth) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for CM/ECF Password by BIANCA COLE. (ztth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BOOZE ALLEN HAMILTON, CACI INTERNATIONAL INC., DAVID S. COHEN, AVRIL HAINES, PERSPECTA/PERATON ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 200743) filed by BIANCA COLE. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ztth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
