UHLENKAMP et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
| BOWEN UHLENKAMP and SADAF LAKHANI |
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
| 1:2021cv02662 |
| October 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Trevor N McFadden |
| Robin M Meriweather |
| Education |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Porter, Veronica) |
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA's #7 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, the Motion is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that Defendant's Answer is due December 15, 2021. Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 12/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robin M. Meriweather on 11/04/2021. (lcre)
|
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on the Mayor of the District of Columbia. Date of Service Upon the Mayor for the District of Columbia on 10/21/2021. (Hecht, Alana) Modified serve date on 11/1/2021 (eg). |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the District of Columbia Attorney General. Date of Service Upon District of Columbia Attorney General 10/21/2021. Answer due for ALL D.C. DEFENDANTS by 11/11/2021. (Hecht, Alana) Modified answer/due date on 11/1/2021 (eg). |
| CASE RANDOMLY REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Robin M. Meriweather for Full Case Management. (znmg) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 10/18/2021. (lctnm1)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, District of Columbia Attorney General, and the District of Columbia Mayor. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
|
MINUTE ORDER REFERRING CASE to a Magistrate Judge, to be assigned at random by the Clerk's Office, for full case management up to but excluding trial, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.2. This includes, with respect to any potentially dispositive motion, the preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.3. The parties are reminded that, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 73.1, they may consent to the assignment of this action to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including trial; consent of the presiding judge is not necessary. It is further ORDERED that any future filings related to this matter shall include the initials of the presiding judge and the magistrate judge following the case number in the caption. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 10/18/2021. (lctnm1)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (znmg) |
| Filing 2 ERRATA to fix caption on Complaint for Appeal by SADAF LAKHANI, BOWEN UHLENKAMP re #1 Complaint, filed by BOWEN UHLENKAMP, SADAF LAKHANI. (Attachments: #1 Errata (caption of Complaint fixed to add Plaintiff's addresses))(Hecht, Alana) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief under IDEA against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by BOWEN UHLENKAMP, SADAF LAKHANI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons DC Mayor Bowser, #3 Summons DC AG Racine, #4 Exhibit 1- Hearing Officer's Determination)(Hecht, Alana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
