ADAMS v. HEAD et al
DALE B. ADAMS |
CHRIS HEAD, JOHN EOFF, MARY JEAN CREAGER, MITCH MAGNESS, RYAN OSWALT, HEATH KIRKPATRICK, JOEL WILLIAMS, DENA WILLIAMS, BURR ROBERTSON, WES BRADFORD, JOHN CAGLE, JERRY JACKSON, CARLOS VALDEZ, DONALD J. TRUMP, ERIC H. HOLDER, JAMES LEWIS, DEBORAH GROOM, KENNETH MAGIDSON, WILLIAM P. BARR, DUANE KEES, ROD ROSENSTEIN and MARK ESPER |
1:2021cv02670 |
October 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/20/2021. (zsb) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/20/2021. (zsb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DALE B. ADAMS. (znmw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 0) with Jury Demand filed by DALE B. ADAMS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits A-G, #3 Affidavits)(znmw) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/14/2021: #4 Summonses) (znmw). |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 10/6/2021. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (znmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.