AMERICAN OVERSIGHT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
| AMERICAN OVERSIGHT |
| FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE |
| 1:2021cv02728 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on December 6, 2021. (lcckk1)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Meet & Confer Statement due by 12/20/2021. (dot) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Riess, Daniel) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 12/3/2021. (kt) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Riess, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Riess on behalf of All Defendants (Riess, Daniel) |
|
MINUTE ORDER: The Court has received Defendants' #7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants ask for an extension of time to December 3, 2021, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs complaint. This is Defendants' first such request, and Plaintiff does not oppose the Motion. Counsel for Defendants states that he was assigned this week to handle the present case,... and [that] [he] will be absent from the office this week because of the Thanksgiving holiday. Mot. at 1, ECF No. 7. Accordingly, and upon good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' #7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED . It is further ORDERED that Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs complaint on or before December 3, 2021. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 11/23/2021. (lcckk1)
|
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 10/25/2021. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/24/2021.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 10/25/21., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION served on 10/25/2021; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE served on 10/25/2021 (Shaw, Khahilia) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 10/18/2021. (DM)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (zsb) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT (Shaw, Khahilia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8802850) filed by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons as to USAO, #3 Summons as to AG, #4 Summons as to FBI, #5 Summons as to DOJ)(Shaw, Khahilia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
