NGUYEN v. JADDOU et al
| NAM V. NGUYEN |
| UR MENDOZA JADDOU, MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND |
| 1:2021cv02767 |
| October 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Tanya S Chutkan |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 11/3/2021. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 1/2/2022.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. MERRICK GARLAND served on 11/2/2021; UR JADDOU served on 11/1/2021; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS served on 11/1/2021, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 11/03/2021. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to MERRICK GARLAND, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (zsb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8806549) filed by NAM V. NGUYEN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
