ZAMANI et al v. BLINKEN et al
| MANDANA ZAMANI and SAYED HOSSEIN S. G. SEFID |
| ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B GARLAND, IAN G. BROWNLEE, PHILIP FRAYNE, JOHN DOE, ANTONY BLINKEN and MERRICK B. GARLAND |
| 1:2021cv02819 |
| October 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Carl J Nichols |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on December 13, 2021. (lccjn3)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IAN G. BROWNLEE, PHILIP FRAYNE, MERRICK B GARLAND, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IAN G. BROWNLEE, JOHN DOE, PHILIP FRAYNE, MERRICK B GARLAND ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8820478) filed by MANDANA ZAMANI, SAYED HOSSEIN S. G. SEFID. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT B, #3 Summons SUMMONS ATT GEN, #4 Summons SUMMONS BINKEN, #5 Summons SUMMONS BROWNLEE, #6 Summons SUMMONS FRAYNE, #7 Summons SUMMONS US ATT, #8 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER)(Jeelani, Hashim) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
